Sofia Martianova vs Daniela Darta Feldmane Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 06:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Martianova vs D. Darta Feldmane

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

LAT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Martianova 1 - 0 Feldmane
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sofia Martianova winning 2 and Daniela Darta Feldmane winning 0. The last match between Sofia Martianova and Daniela Darta Feldmane was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Sofia Martianova getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martianova | 1 |
| Feldmane | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(10-01-25)
S. Martianova vs D. D. Feldmane H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.94% (36-32) | Career Total W/L | 51.28% (20-19) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Martianova vs D. D. Feldmane Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Daniela Darta Feldmane excels on her second serve, winning 37.99% of points, slightly better than Sofia Martianova's 34.72%. Could this serve advantage determine the match?
- Return Game Strength: Both players are strong in returning; Feldmane captures 55.81% of opponent second serves, compared to Martianova’s 53.44%. On first serves, Feldmane also leads with 38.35% over Martianova’s 35.62%.
- Pressure Situations: When facing breakpoints, Martianova shows resilience, saving 46.15%, while Feldmane saves 41.10%. Will Martianova's composure give her the edge in tight moments?
- Overall Performance: Martianova has a superior match win rate in the past year, securing 57.89% of her matches, while Feldmane maintains a 52.00% win rate. Who shows better consistency?
- Surface Preference: Feldmane thrives on Hard courts with an 80% win rate, whereas Martianova is most successful on Clay with the same win percentage. How will the surface influence their play?
- Player Experience: Feldmane typically competes against higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 56.84, contrasting with Martianova’s 188.54. Does Feldmane's exposure to tougher competition make her better prepared?
- Deciding Set Strategy: In deciding sets, Martianova slightly edges out with a 53% win rate compared to Feldmane's 50% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the players based on their recent form, Daniela Darta Feldmane displays stronger performance metrics on second serves and returns, giving her a perceptible edge in exchanges that often decide close matches.
Sofia Martianova, however, demonstrates better mental toughness under pressure, reflected in her higher breakpoint save percentage. Additionally, her superior match win rate advocates her consistency over the past year. The surface will also play a crucial role; while Feldmane shows dominance on Hard courts, Martianova's strength lies on Clay.
Both players present compelling strengths, yet Martianova’s resilience under pressure and slight advantage in overall match consistency suggest she has a slight upper hand for the upcoming match. Therefore, based on the provided statistics and trends, Sofia Martianova is anticipated to be the most likely winner.
Sofia Martianova vs Daniela Darta Feldmane Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Martianova vs D. D. Feldmane H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:30:28 | Average Match Time | 1:30:28 |
| 68% (45/66) | 1st Serve % | 52% (26/50) |
| 73% (33/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12/24) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
| 50% (25/50) | Return Points Win % | 35% (23/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Martianova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
D. D. Feldmane Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||

S. Martianova vs D. D. Feldmane Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.94% (36/32) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.28% (20/19) |
| 52.90% (82/73) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 52.77% (780/698) | Games Win/Loss | 51.99% (391/361) |
| 50.91% (28/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 72.73% (8/3) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (12/16) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 55 | Aces Total | 5 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 94 | Total Double Faults | 77 |
| 1:5:17 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 202.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 122.44 |
| 67% (1949/2896) | 1st Serve % | 66% (589/896) |
| 59% (1141/1949) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (307/589) |
| 40% (380/947) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (115/307) |
| 50% (163/323) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 58% (62/106) |
| 46% (1223/2675) | Return Points Win % | 48% (436/913) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 52.38% (33/30) | Futures W/L | 54.29% (19/16) |
| 52% (35/67) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 42% (5/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 45% (9/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 86% (37/32) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (19/18) |
| 14% (37/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (19/1) |
| 13% (31/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (20/2) |